Gartner vs. Google’s Cloud: One of them didn’t float with IT Leaders

  • Vote This Post

    1

I had the privilege of attending Midsize Enterprise Summit in Orlando this week.  While the weather has been delightful, the long days of the conference made sure we didn’t really get time to enjoy it.

The theme of the week has been cloud computing, and several notable experts from Gartner Research, as well as industry representative from such organizations as Microsoft, HP, and Google have shared their organization’s vision of what cloud computing is all about.

Gartner Analyst Tom Bittman provided possibly the best view of cloud computing in two separate keynote addresses.  In a nutshell, he stated that Cloud computing is a style of computing and comes in many variations from a full public cloud, a mixture of public/private, as well as closed private clouds.

His other key points and recommendations:

- Cloud computing won’t save the world, but ignoring it will put you at competitive disadvantage.

- Research shows that cloud computing is “not quite ready”, proceed with caution, but that doesn’t mean don’t proceed.  The only bad cloud strategy is no cloud strategy.

- IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) will be the graveyard for old applications.  It initially looks easier, but ends up requiring more work to maintain. This is not the area to pursue to build differentiation.

- PaaS (Platform as a Service)  is preferred.  This will be the primary place for new development, new applications.

- SaaS (Software as a Service)  will be best for commodity software, (e.g. email, office apps) which are products and services that are essential, but do not provide a differentiating advantage for your organization.

- There will not be a single Cloud provider of everything you may need. Cloud broker services will become the new systems integrator.

- Most implementations will be mixed.  Traditional infrastructure will exist with brokered services.

- The most appropriate for cloud:

-  Non differentiating applications (e.g mail)

-  Static service – very little change

-  Very separate from business.

Applications and services you should not put into the cloud:

-       Those that are a business differentiator.

-        Those that change often

-        Those that are highly integrated with business operations

This was much in alignment with the other keynote presentations, with one exception.

Jay Remley, Head of MidMarket Sales, Google Enterprises presented his vision of  Innovation at the pace of 100% web.  Apparently someone forgot to mention that he really should check to see who might be in attendance in the audience before he gave his presentation.  If it is a room full of CIOs and IT Directors, the Male Bovine Effluent Detectors are highly tuned.

Rather than an overview of Google’s strategy regarding the cloud, we were subjected to a sales pitch for Google’s web products and the Chrome operating system.  After telling us how bad and costly is was to have our own infrastructure, he described the move to 100% Web as the only viable alternative. As an example, he then pulled out a Chrome based computer (which he called a “webtop”) and used the scenario that he had been working on a document on the airplane, but then had accident (which he simulated by throwing the webtop on the ground).

He picked up a new webtop and showed us the magic of how his work was safe, because it had been stored in the cloud.

Given how quiet it was in the room, I’m sure I wasn’t the only skeptical one.  Which airline is he flying?  Getting an Internet connection in the air is not ubiquitous. If you are travelling and don’t have Donald Trump’s money to pay data roaming charges, then you are at the mercy of finding wifi signals to get your mail.

Mr. Remley’s document may have been safe, but his connection with the audience had just tanked.  The questions at the end of the session were not gracious, and poked holes in much of Google’s cloud strategy.  What about offline caching? What about doing more than corporate documents?  What about performance?  The standard answer became “We are working on it this summer”.

I’m sure Mr. Remley was glad when the session was over.  Given the relatively complete and realistic view of the current state of the cloud given by Gartner, Microsoft, and HP, Google was sadly an outlier.  He really should have read his audience better and skipped the marketing spin, and concentrated on how Google would work with real world issues that mid market enterprises are facing today.

We were not amused.

 

Related posts from Blog Idol:

Cloud Computing for Dummies

What is Cloud Computing (Don Sheppard)

The Most Important Blog Post on Strategy You’ll Ever Read

InvisiTech InvisiTech (46 Posts)

While I'm currently the CIO for Appleby College in Oakville (the best IT job in Canada), I've had a great ride in a number of positions in various locations. I've lead a team of more than 100 staff at Sheridan supporting a constituency of 50,000 users, I've been part of the founding team building a brand new medical school in Northern Ontario based completely around distributed education, I've started 3 companies, consulted internationally, drove my gorgeous wife crazy moving around all over, raised 2-1/2 great kids (I'll round it up when the final one leaves home), and occasionally scratch the ear of our butt ugly dog. My craft is not IT, but building IT organizations that support challenging and new ways to do things. I am utterly convinced that we as IT leadership need to dramatically change how IT is delivered, before we get relegated to a costly overhead department. In the midst of all this fun, I've had the distinction of being awarded the inaugural 2010 IT Leader of the Year (SME) Award from Computerworld Canada for my work at Appleby College. I'm humbled by the honor and thankful that some of my ideas actually make sense to someone.


Tags:
  • http://www.concon.com Don Sheppard

    I like the thought that Cloud Computing is a style of computing – fits with my comparison to distributed computing in an earlier post.

    I’m not too sure that simply having a web-based user interface makes it Cloud Computing. Are hotmail, gmail and iTunes examples of SaaS Cloud Computing?

  • Michael Gerochi

    I like this discussion about the defintion of the “Cloud”. I agree with the word “Style” as well. Simply using the internet doesn’t mean it’s Cloud Computing. Perhaps someone will come up with a taxonomy of Cloud computing, compelte with vendor lists representing each “style”. 10 years ago, I worked for a company that was getting into the “ASP” market. We didn’t call it cloud back then, but today it would be exactly what you call a critical operational application that was hosted by an external Application Service Provider via web. So can we safely say that ASP’s are a style of Cloud Computing?

  • http://www.concon.com Don Sheppard

    NIST is doing a taxonomy…..my post on what is cloud has a link to the draft paper at NIST.

    Not sure I’d use the word “style” for categories of Cloud Computing, but an ASP might certainly qualify as a subset of CC – a subset with dedicated resources, little elasticity and not pay as you go !!

  • George Farahat

    I would be interested to know how Gartner and other professionals think of the future of cloud computing in the public sector given that much of the data handled by that sector is highly confidential.

    • http://turningtechinvisible.blogspot.com Kevin Pashuk

      There is much talk of the “private cloud”, a closed system that might be more appropriate for gov’t etc. But more likely it will be a combo of public/private, built to leverage the scalability of the cloud structure – e.g. CRA could scale up their computing requirements during tax season, and have the same resources used for NRC duing the off season.

      I’ll repeat the thought I put in my post today… If RIM can create a Blackberry for the President of the United States, then we should be able to figure out how to leverage cloud computing, without compromising security.