Clear views on what tablets/pads are for

  • Vote This Post

    2

The hand-held market’s evolution is starting to take serious shape, and IT planners can start to answer the question “which tablet(s)/pad(s) are right for us?”

From an IT point of view, the two primary vendors going forward will be Apple, with the iPad, and Microsoft, with the Surface (whether you choose to standardize on the actual Microsoft offering, or one using Windows 8 from another vendor).

Both of these vendors have laid out a clear definition of what their device is, how it’s expected to be used, and therefore where it fits.

The various vendors of Android tablets/pads, or the BlackBerry PlayBook from RIM, remain also-rans, as they are all “me, too” devices without a clear design philosophy or purpose in mind.

Apple’s vision of the iPad is as a device primarily doing two things: running an app to do a job, or acting as a device to consume and display information.

Although you can run Apple’s iWork offerings — the Numbers spreadsheet, the Pages word processor and the Keynote presentation tool — and they work well on the pad, general office work isn’t part of Apple’s design philosophy.

Your IT function creating custom apps for parts of your business is. So, too, is using the pad for very light editing of documents, but fundamentally viewing them.

In Apple’s world, if you need a full blown light-weight portable computer, you use a MacBook Air — which has a full-blown keyboard, and can run Microsoft Office.

Microsoft’s design philosophy is of the Surface as a very portable computer. It’s a hybrid device trying to straddle the Air (or Intel-based Ultrabooks) and the iPad.

Running Microsoft Office 2013 on Windows 8 Metro — the configuration recommended for the Surface — shows how the conversion to pad-type operation is only partly done. This is still an environment that isn’t fully either touch or keyboard/pointer.

For people who need a PC in their hand, though, it’s a viable option — although trying to do most business functions will require it to be set down so the keyboard can be used.

So: custom app solutions? Either could be used.

Viewing platform: iPad actually does a better job.

Need a sort-of PC for office work: go with Surface.

Both will co-exist nicely in the workplace. Here’s one of those both/and situations: put the right device in the right hands and keep your TCOO (total cost to own and operate) and your frustration levels in check.

Bruce Stewart Bruce Stewart (99 Posts)

Bruce Stewart is a 39 year veteran of IT management and above. He is an executive advisor serving CIOs and senior executives in areas of governance, strategy, complex architectural transitions, portfolio yield and value generation.


  • http://twitter.com/storagepipe StoragepipeSolutions

    These roles will die out when the PC era comes to an end and we all go VDI or SaaS for all of our productivity apps.

    It’ll be sooner than you think. 

    • http://twitter.com/BruceStewart Bruce Stewart

      I’ll be surprised if it’s that soon, if only because of the sheer number of people out there still running client-server code (heavily modified) with no path forward from it. But we’ll see…

  • DonSheppard

    I’m guessing that younger people coming into the workplace may be less involved with MS products, and more interested in BYOD, so whatever they would use personally may be their device of choice for the office too.  This may give Android systems some potential as well as Apple.
    It will certainly be interesting to see how fast the transformation to cloud and non-client/server access happens.

    • http://twitter.com/BruceStewart Bruce Stewart

      I agree that both Android and Apple will benefit from newcomers bringing the technology with them. 

      What we as enterprise-oriented folk need to do is to start thinking about how we exchange items and not what standards are used to create them. If everyone can use a Word .docx file, for instance, does it matter whether it was created in Office 2007, Office 2010, Office 2013, Mac Office 2008, Mac Office 2011, Pages, G-Docs, etc.?

      I firmly believe that as the BYOD journey continues to unfold we will shift to the notion of funding periodic technology replacement — but not dictate what it is. We will start to value individuals (staff, contractor, service provider or consultant) bringing their mix of prior art to the table (much like mashups on the public Internet) to be reworked, reapplied in new situations. In other words, craft tools.

      That’s going to cause innumerable IP worries to emerge, but I think it’s inevitable, since that same younger generation firmly believes in sharing and repurposing, too.